[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFC: britney's "hint classes"

Philipp Kern <pkern@debian.org> (26/01/2012):
> At least [easy, hint, remove, block, block-udeb] either can't do harm
> and/or can be easily reverted.  (In theory getting a package back into
> testing that was gracefully removed should be doable, but yes, there
> are cases where it might be hard because other packages got in
> instead.)  For [unblock, unblock-udeb, approve] that's not true
> because you can't get back in time once they're in.  But it's
> necessary during freeze times to have all manpower available reviewing
> packages, I guess that's why they're in the set.

What about age-days?

(not totally random example: iceweasel.)


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: