Michael Biebl <email@example.com> (20/01/2012): > > Or are we heading for having a separate libmozjs package, which would > > solve half the current problem with new iceweasel releases? > > http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/mozjs_1.8.5-1.0.0+dfsg-1.html > > At least for GNOME/gjs we are planning to use mozjs185 as soon as it has > been accepted from NEW and built on all architectures. With gjs 1.32 > (the next major upstream release for GNOME 3.4) upstream has made > mozjs185 mandatory. So unless we patch gjs heavily we don't have much of > a choice anyway. Thanks to your hint, this should be more or less buildable everywhere with this upload… or with the next one. I can try and get this transition done soonish now that we see the light on the mozjs side. Mraw, KiBi.
Description: Digital signature