On 15.01.2012 08:47, Arthur de Jong wrote:
On Thu, 2012-01-12 at 22:10 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:Any chance you could consider an upload with *just* the above change (and a changelog entry), and without the version change noise in the rest of your diff?I could do this but the other two functional changes, although not affecting many users, are bugs with simple and clear fixes. The range checking patch is a little bigger though. Is there any reason the other changes are inappropriate?
I assume Julien had missed your follow-up with the other patches and the "just" was in reference to the upstream changes. icbw though, of course.
I could upload a 0.7.15+squeeze1 package with just the one change(#645599, no version bumps) if you like but 0.7.16 would be easier for me to track versions. I'm planning on switching to non-native packagingto make these things simpler in the future.
If the two further changes included in the debdiff from <1324994307.2556.15.camel@sorbet.thuis.net> are resovled in unstable (if appropriate) then I'd be happy to look at including those in a stable update. I have to admit that, like Julien, I would prefer an update that only includes the changes relevant to the bug fixes; I appreciate this means a little more maintenance burden when you're dealing with a native package.
Regards, Adam