[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Proposed update to python-debian



Thijs Kinkhorst <thijs@debian.org> schrieb:
> On Thu, December 29, 2011 09:10, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> On 28.12.2011 23:45, John Wright wrote:
>>> Attached is a patch to the python-debian package which I intend to
>>> upload to stable.
>>
>> Apparently you already _have_ uploaded it.
>>
>> Eight hours is really not a long enough time to have waited for a
>> response, particularly when practically all of the release team memebers
>> handling stable are in Europe and were likely asleep for the majority of
>> those eight hours.  For future reference, the expected workflow - as
>> outlined in the Developers Reference and a number of mails to d-d-a - is
>> to wait for an acknowledgement before uploading.  Now that you've
>> uploaded the package will be processed in due course, but it would be
>> appreciated if you could bear this in mind for any future uploads.
>
> This problem seems to occur with regular intervals. Wouldn't it be
> possible to change dak so that uploads are queued in a way that makes it
> less of a problem should they not be accepted lateron? Also makes it
> easier for the uploader (upload it now - don't have to keep your build
> around) and the srm's (can review the actual uploaded package instead of
> an emailed debdiff). Perhaps something like a DELAYED queue with infinite
> delay?

Or simply add a "really upload" confirmation as it's already done for
security uploads: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=458628

(At least for dput, we really should converge to a single archive upload
helper... )

Cheers,
        Moritz





Reply to: