[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#635286: marked as done (nmu: tiff_3.9.5-1)



Your message dated Wed, 17 Aug 2011 23:20:17 +0200
with message-id <20110817212017.GO2820@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#635286: nmu: tiff_3.9.5-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #635286,
regarding nmu: tiff_3.9.5-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
635286: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=635286
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

nmu tiff_3.9.5-1 . ALL . -m "Migrate to libjpeg8"

I'm requesting a binnmu of tiff to build against libjpeg8. No changes were
needed for tiff to build against libjpeg8.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.39-2-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 23:42:34 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:

> On Sun, 24 Jul 2011 13:15:40 -0400, Andres Mejia wrote:
> >nmu tiff_3.9.5-1 . ALL . -m "Migrate to libjpeg8"
> >
> >I'm requesting a binnmu of tiff to build against libjpeg8. No
> >changes were
> >needed for tiff to build against libjpeg8.
> 
> The bug log for #634194 suggests that the current situation doesn't
> actually cause any issues.  Is that correct?
> 
> I realise that it's marked as a blocker for #634550, although it's
> not immediately clear from the bug log why, other than "because the
> maintainer said so".
> 
Closing since it's not blocking anything afaik, and will be handled as
part of #547393.

Cheers,
Julien


--- End Message ---

Reply to: