[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#635269: marked as done (nmu: sdl-image1.2_1.2.10-2.1)

Your message dated Wed, 17 Aug 2011 23:18:56 +0200
with message-id <20110817211856.GN2820@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#635269: nmu: sdl-image1.2_1.2.10-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #635269,
regarding nmu: sdl-image1.2_1.2.10-2.1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
635269: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=635269
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

nmu sdl-image1.2_1.2.10-2.1 . ALL . -m "Migrate to libjpeg8"

I'm requesting a binNMU of sdl-image1.2 to build against libjpeg8. No changes
are needed for sdl-image1.2.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.39-2-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 19:12:35 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:

> On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 11:03:31 -0400, Andres Mejia wrote:
> 
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: binnmu
> > 
> > nmu sdl-image1.2_1.2.10-2.1 . ALL . -m "Migrate to libjpeg8"
> > 
> > I'm requesting a binNMU of sdl-image1.2 to build against libjpeg8. No changes
> > are needed for sdl-image1.2.
> > 
> Is there any reason to schedule this urgently, instead of together with
> the $deity_knows_how_many other libjpeg reverse deps?  If not, I'd
> rather wait.
> 
I guess not.  Closing.

Cheers,
Julien

--- End Message ---
Reply to: