Re: [RFC] Breaking britney2's backward compatibility
"Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> writes:
> Indeed - that's largely why they're appearing in the list. :-) "Old" in
> this case means "no longer produced by a source in testing".
> The above is the result of a "non-compatible" run, in which opensaml2
> 2.4.3-1, xmltooling 1.4.2-1 and xml-security-c 1.6.1-1 migrated, with
> the old libraries being held in testing until shibboleth-sp2 can also
> migrate and nothing remains in testing which depends on the old set of
> libraries.
Oh! I see. That's actually really neat, and looks like exactly the right
thing to have happen.
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to: