[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [RFC] Breaking britney2's backward compatibility



"Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> writes:

> Not at the moment, but I suspect it wouldn't be hugely difficult to add.
> This is an example of the output, from a recent(ish) data set:

> List of old libraries in testing (53):
>   libsaml6: i386 amd64 armel ia64 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc
>   libxmltooling4: i386 amd64 armel ia64 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc
>   libxml-security-c15: i386 amd64 armel ia64 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc

If one removed those from testing, it would make shibboleth-sp2
uninstallable in testing.  They're all old because they're all blocked on
migrating to testing because shibboleth-sp2 doesn't build on unstable due
to a g++ bug on armel.

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org)               <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>


Reply to: