[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [SRU] non-free/clustalw and non-free/clustalx relicensed to LGPL-3+.

On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 10:33:06AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> I understand your decision for clustalx.  I think that there would still be a
> benefit to have clustalw in main for Squeeze, in particular for the generation
> of entirely Free Squeeze derivatives for science.  While we offer a large number
> of alternatives, Clustal W is the reference in its field.

Would it make sense to "just" offer a backport of the current version
through backports.d.o instead?

Kind regards
Philipp Kern

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: