[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#633460: pu: package freebsd-utils/8.1-4+squeeze1

On Mon, 2011-07-11 at 20:37 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> 2011/7/11 Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>:
> > I notice that you've already uploaded the package including both sets of
> > changes.  Whilst we're admittedly sometimes not the fastest to respond,
> > a lack of negative reply does not equate to permission to upload -
> > particularly when barely 24 hours have passed since the initial request.
> Sorry about that, I wasn't sure if approval needed to happen before or
> after the upload.

Having it beforehand tends to make things easier if there are any
queries or issues.

> I'll keep in mind next time.


> > In any case, I'm afraid I'll be rejecting the upload, due to the amount
> > of cruft in the diff; e.g.
> Those issues aside, are the diffs I presented acceptable?

In all honesty, I haven't yet had time to review them; I mostly replied
at this point because of the diff noise - if it hadn't been for that,
I'd probably not have commented until I (or someone else) had checked
them a little more.

Looking at the BTS, it appears from the log of #601803 that the proposed
changes to ifconfig for wireless support have not yet been proved to be
complete and functional in unstable - is that correct?  Where the issue
applies to both stable and unstable/testing, having it resolved in the
latter suites is generally a prerequisite for a stable update.



Reply to: