Bug#547393: libjpeg8 transition.
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 11:43:40PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 23:13:03 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > Given the large legacy of libjpeg62, it is probably safer to keep it.
> > Also having libjpeg62-dev an alias for libjpeg8-dev is going to be
> > confusing. I will report bug to packages that Depends on libjpeg62-dev
> > as a first step.
> Alright, thank you.
I have prepared the new packages. They are at
There still remain 15 packages dependending on libjpeg62-dev, however I am not sure it
is worth delaying the transition more. Maybe I should just upload the new packages.
Imagine a large red swirl here.