Re: What should we do with iceweasel/xulrunner/libmozjs?

To: debian-release@lists.debian.org, pkg-mozilla-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Subject: Re: What should we do with iceweasel/xulrunner/libmozjs?
From: Julien Cristau <julien@cristau.org>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 16:44:35 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20110524144435.GA19961@coloquinte.cristau.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20110524060013.GA31876@glandium.org>
References: <20110218091242.GA4282@glandium.org> <1298021367.2507.142.camel@deep-thought> <1298030386.18394.65.camel@meh> <20110218123427.GB22394@glandium.org> <[🔎] 20110513071942.GA7434@glandium.org> <[🔎] 1305280609.30903.65.camel@pi0307572> <[🔎] 20110524060013.GA31876@glandium.org>

On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 08:00:13 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:

> Any insight from the release team?
> 
What's the list of affected packages?

Cheers,
Julien

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: What should we do with iceweasel/xulrunner/libmozjs?
  - From: Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org>

References:
- Re: What should we do with iceweasel/xulrunner/libmozjs?
  - From: Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org>
- Re: What should we do with iceweasel/xulrunner/libmozjs?
  - From: Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org>
- Re: What should we do with iceweasel/xulrunner/libmozjs?
  - From: Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org>

Prev by Date: Bug#624637: transition: libquicktime
Next by Date: Re: What should we do with iceweasel/xulrunner/libmozjs?
Previous by thread: Re: What should we do with iceweasel/xulrunner/libmozjs?
Next by thread: Re: What should we do with iceweasel/xulrunner/libmozjs?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread