[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#626691: marked as done (nmu: rasmol/2.7.5-3)

Your message dated Sat, 14 May 2011 15:07:20 +0200
with message-id <4DCE7E88.5020608@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#626691: nmu: rasmol/2.7.5-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #626691,
regarding nmu: rasmol/2.7.5-3
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
626691: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=626691
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

nmu rasmol_2.7.5-3 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against neartree'

-- 
  .''`.
 :  :' :   Luca Falavigna <dktrkranz@debian.org>
 `.  `'
   `-

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Il 14/05/2011 13:34, Adam D. Barratt ha scritto:
> Hmmm, rasmol doesn't appear to end up with a binary dependency on
> libcneartree.  I wonder if that's a bug, one way or the other.

Indeed, it's probably an oversight my side.

-- 
  .''`.
 :  :' :   Luca Falavigna <dktrkranz@debian.org>
 `.  `'
   `-

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: