Your message dated Sat, 14 May 2011 13:01:49 +0100 with message-id <1305374510.20523.3417.camel@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org> and subject line Re: Bug#626690: nmu: ldb transition has caused the Debian Bug report #626690, regarding nmu: ldb transition to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 626690: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=626690 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: nmu: ldb transition
- From: Luca Falavigna <dktrkranz@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 12:53:29 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 4DCE5F29.1020501@debian.org>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu openchange_1:0.10~bzr1804-1 . armel . -m 'Rebuild against ldb' nmu samba4_4.0.0~alpha14~bzr13684.dfsg1-1 . armel . -m 'Rebuild against ldb' nmu sssd_1.2.1-4.1 . armel . -m 'Rebuild against ldb' -- .''`. : :' : Luca Falavigna <dktrkranz@debian.org> `. `' `-Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Luca Falavigna <dktrkranz@debian.org>, 626690-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#626690: nmu: ldb transition
- From: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
- Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 13:01:49 +0100
- Message-id: <1305374510.20523.3417.camel@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 4DCE5F29.1020501@debian.org>
- References: <[🔎] 4DCE5F29.1020501@debian.org>
On Sat, 2011-05-14 at 12:53 +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote: > nmu openchange_1:0.10~bzr1804-1 . armel . -m 'Rebuild against ldb' > nmu samba4_4.0.0~alpha14~bzr13684.dfsg1-1 . armel . -m 'Rebuild against ldb' > nmu sssd_1.2.1-4.1 . armel . -m 'Rebuild against ldb' Scheduled, although with s/armel/ALL/g; thanks. (The binaries still depend on libldb0 on all architectures, regardless of it having apparently already been removed from unstable on !armel) Regards, Adam
--- End Message ---