Re: NMU of mdadm for squeeze-proposed-upates
----- Original message -----
> also sprach Julien Cristau <firstname.lastname@example.org> [2011.05.03.2004 +0200]:
> > I don't think that's worth a stable update on its own.
> It's apparently an inconvenience to our users, and fixable with
> a trivial patch. Are there arguments against it going into the next
Let's say you have 500 servers, then you get 500
useless warning emails for no valid reasons. Yes,
that's quite annoying, and I do believe worth an
update for large installations. Patching by had is
even more a
What's your argument against the update if not
Julien the worthyness, which I believe is a mater
of opinion depending on the number of server one
has to do admin on?