[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [SRU] kupfer_0+v201-2+squeeze1

On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 12:53:56PM +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> Il 15/04/2011 20:06, Luca Falavigna ha scritto:
> > Il 14/04/2011 23:29, Philipp Kern ha scritto:
> >> After staring at the code a little longer: what keybinder returns from that
> >> function is a guint32, so shouldn't it be TYPE_UINT?  And why does it
> >> overflow?  I guess the reason it overflows comes from the X server (where
> >> it's a CARD32 so uint32, too).  It's not entirely clear to me why, though.
> > After talking with Ulrik (upstream developer), he made me notice current
> > upstream code has TYPE_UINT, so using it should be a better choice. He
> > told me this bug could be caused by X server being active for a lot of
> > time, making its timestamp bigger than the variable defined by Kupfer.
> Attaching debdiff this time.

Yep, please go ahead.

Kind regards
Philipp Kern

Reply to: