[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#619974: marked as done (nmu: qscintilla2_2.4.3-1+b1)



Your message dated Mon, 4 Apr 2011 13:44:12 +0200
with message-id <20110404114412.GA15477@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#619974: nmu: qscintilla2_2.4.3-1+b1
has caused the Debian Bug report #619974,
regarding nmu: qscintilla2_2.4.3-1+b1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
619974: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=619974
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

nmu qscintilla2_2.4.3-1+b1 . alpha amd64 sparc64 . -m "Package rebuild. (Closes: #619096)."

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (900, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.37-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 10:42:36 -0700, Ludovico Cavedon wrote:

> On 03/30/2011 07:11 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > The real problem appears to be that the python-qt4 libraries break ABI
> > without providing any indication of that fact to reverse-dependencies.
> > That should really be fixed so that the r-deps don't just break with no
> > warning.
> 
> CCing python-qt4 maintainers.
> 
There doesn't appear to be anything -release should do here, so closing
this bug.  (If there was indeed ABI breakage then that needs fixing in
the affected package, not rebuilds.)

Cheers,
Julien


--- End Message ---

Reply to: