Hi, sorry for the delay. On 27/03/2011 21:59, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 21:47 -0700, tony mancill wrote: >> I received email from Adam on Feb 13th regarding letting the NMU for >> #609813 age in unstable before fixing it in stable. Is it correct to >> assume that patch has aged enough? > > So far as I can see, no regressions relating to the patch have been > reported since that point? If so then yes we could look again at > including it in a stable update. > >> I haven't been involved with #598474; I'm adding Giovanni Mascellani to >> the cc: since he did an NMU for that bug. Also, I haven't heard >> anything from Ludovic in several months. > > Okay, thanks. Giovanni? Unfortunately I don't think I have anything to comment here. I'm not a regular user of atftpd, I just fixed (a part of) #598474 in order to ease the release of squeeze. I don't think that my patch has anything to do with this problem (it should only impact the compilation under a FreeBSD kernel), while this seems to be a problem also with Linux. Ciao, Giovanni. -- Giovanni Mascellani <mascellani@poisson.phc.unipi.it> Pisa, Italy Web: http://poisson.phc.unipi.it/~mascellani Jabber: g.mascellani@jabber.org / giovanni@elabor.homelinux.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature