[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: proposed update to atftpd package in stable

Hi, sorry for the delay.

On 27/03/2011 21:59, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 21:47 -0700, tony mancill wrote:
>> I received email from Adam on Feb 13th regarding letting the NMU for
>> #609813 age in unstable before fixing it in stable.  Is it correct to
>> assume that patch has aged enough?
> So far as I can see, no regressions relating to the patch have been
> reported since that point?  If so then yes we could look again at
> including it in a stable update.
>> I haven't been involved with #598474; I'm adding Giovanni Mascellani to
>> the cc: since he did an NMU for that bug.  Also, I haven't heard
>> anything from Ludovic in several months.
> Okay, thanks.  Giovanni?

Unfortunately I don't think I have anything to comment here. I'm not a
regular user of atftpd, I just fixed (a part of) #598474 in order to
ease the release of squeeze.

I don't think that my patch has anything to do with this problem (it
should only impact the compilation under a FreeBSD kernel), while this
seems to be a problem also with Linux.

Ciao, Giovanni.
Giovanni Mascellani <mascellani@poisson.phc.unipi.it>
Pisa, Italy

Web: http://poisson.phc.unipi.it/~mascellani
Jabber: g.mascellani@jabber.org / giovanni@elabor.homelinux.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply to: