Re: proposed update to atftpd package in stable
On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 21:47 -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> I received email from Adam on Feb 13th regarding letting the NMU for
> #609813 age in unstable before fixing it in stable. Is it correct to
> assume that patch has aged enough?
So far as I can see, no regressions relating to the patch have been
reported since that point? If so then yes we could look again at
including it in a stable update.
> I haven't been involved with #598474; I'm adding Giovanni Mascellani to
> the cc: since he did an NMU for that bug. Also, I haven't heard
> anything from Ludovic in several months.
Okay, thanks. Giovanni?