[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: please consider cryptsetup 2:1.1.3-4squeeze1 for stable-proposed-updates and point release



hey,

On 10/03/2011 Jonas wrote:
> On 09/03/2011 Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 21:52 +0100, Jonas Meurer wrote:
> > > cryptsetup (2:1.1.3-4squeeze1) stable-proposed-updates; urgency=low
> > >
> > >   * NOT RELEASED YET
> > 
> > I was going to grumble about that, but then realised it's not in the
> > debdiff. :-)
> 
> argh, fail! I fixed this in svn, but didn't rebuild the package
> afterwards. therefore the 'NOT RELEASED YET' is still in the changelog.
> should I upload 1.1.3-4squeeze2 to fix the changelog?

I uploaded 2:1.1.3-4squeeze2 to s-p-u now, as 'NOT RELEASED YET' should
not appear in the changelog for updates of a stable release.

please accept. sorry for the noise. debdiff (this time the real one)
attached.

greetings,
 jonas
diff -Nru cryptsetup-1.1.3/debian/changelog cryptsetup-1.1.3/debian/changelog
--- cryptsetup-1.1.3/debian/changelog	2011-03-09 21:22:31.000000000 +0100
+++ cryptsetup-1.1.3/debian/changelog	2011-03-10 21:46:31.000000000 +0100
@@ -1,13 +1,18 @@
+cryptsetup (2:1.1.3-4squeeze2) stable-proposed-updates; urgency=low
+
+  * fix changelog for cryptsetup 2:1.1.3-4squeeze1.
+
+ -- Jonas Meurer <mejo@debian.org>  Thu, 10 Mar 2011 21:45:56 +0100
+
 cryptsetup (2:1.1.3-4squeeze1) stable-proposed-updates; urgency=low
 
-  * NOT RELEASED YET
   * install cryptkeyctl initramfs hook, needed for keyctl keyscript in
     initramfs, thanks to Maik Zumstrull (closes: #610750)
   * fix luksformat script to invoke usage() with --help. (closes: #612947)
   * luksformat: invoke udevadm settle between mkfs.vfat and luksClose, to
     prevent possible race conditions. This is a workaround. (closes: #601886)
 
- -- Jonas Meurer <mejo@debian.org>  Wed, 09 Mar 2011 21:21:11 +0100
+ -- Jonas Meurer <mejo@debian.org>  Wed, 09 Mar 2011 21:49:36 +0100
 
 cryptsetup (2:1.1.3-4) unstable; urgency=high
 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: