[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#615062: marked as done (nmu: packages broken by #613848)



Your message dated Fri, 25 Feb 2011 16:39:43 +0100
with message-id <4D67CD3F.5040706@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#615062: nmu: packages broken by #613848
has caused the Debian Bug report #615062,
regarding nmu: packages broken by #613848
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
615062: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=615062
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

Hello,

Here is a binNMU request for packages that are broken by the
(mini-)transition tracked with #613848. I've simulated it on amd64,
and everything compiles [1] except ocaml-melt which seems broken by an
external bug [2, not investigated yet] and liquidsoap, which is
BD-uninstallable independently of this transition.

# nothing to do for lablgtk2 (>= 2.14.2+dfsg-1)
# camlimages has the following arch:all packages: libcamlimages-ocaml-doc
nmu 4 camlimages_1:3.0.1-5 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild with new lablgtk2'
dw camlimages_1:3.0.1-5 . ALL . -m 'liblablgtk2-gl-ocaml (>= 2.14.2+dfsg-1)'
# advi has the following arch:all packages: advi-examples
# ocamlgraph has the following arch:all packages: libocamlgraph-ocaml-doc
nmu 1 ocamlgraph_1.5-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild with new lablgtk2'
dw ocamlgraph_1.5-1 . ALL . -m 'liblablgtk2-gl-ocaml (>= 2.14.2+dfsg-1)'
# nothing to do for pcre-ocaml (>= 6.2.2-1)
# ocamlnet has the following arch:all packages: libocamlnet-ocaml-doc
nmu 2 ocamlnet_2.2.9-8 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild with new lablgtk2, pcre-ocaml'
dw ocamlnet_2.2.9-8 . ALL . -m 'liblablgtk2-gl-ocaml (>= 2.14.2+dfsg-1), libpcre-ocaml (>= 6.2.2-1)'
# nothing to do for ounit (>= 1.1.0-3)
# nothing to do for bin-prot (>= 1.2.24-1)
nmu 3 cairo-ocaml_20090223-3 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild with new lablgtk2'
dw cairo-ocaml_20090223-3 . ALL . -m 'liblablgtk2-gl-ocaml (>= 2.14.2+dfsg-1)'
# cameleon has the following arch:all packages: cameleon-doc
nmu 2 cameleon_1.9.19-2 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild with new lablgtk2, pcre-ocaml'
dw cameleon_1.9.19-2 . ALL . -m 'liblablgtk2-gl-ocaml (>= 2.14.2+dfsg-1), libpcre-ocaml (>= 6.2.2-1)'
# nothing to do for camlp5 (>= 6.02.1-1)
nmu 4 cduce_0.5.3-2 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild with new ocamlnet, pcre-ocaml'
dw cduce_0.5.3-2 . ALL . -m 'libapache2-mod-ocamlnet (>= 2.2.9-8+b2), libpcre-ocaml (>= 6.2.2-1)'
nmu 2 dose2_1.4.2-3 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild with new pcre-ocaml'
dw dose2_1.4.2-3 . ALL . -m 'libpcre-ocaml (>= 6.2.2-1)'
# cmigrep has the following arch:all packages: cmigrep
# nothing to do for coq (>= 8.2.pl2+dfsg-2)
nmu 1 frama-c_20100401+boron+dfsg-5 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild with new lablgtk2, ocamlgraph'
dw frama-c_20100401+boron+dfsg-5 . ALL . -m 'liblablgtk2-gl-ocaml (>= 2.14.2+dfsg-1), libocamlgraph-ocaml-dev (>= 1.5-1+b1)'
# freetennis has the following arch:all packages: freetennis-common
nmu 2 pxp_1.2.1-2 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild with new ocamlnet'
dw pxp_1.2.1-2 . ALL . -m 'libapache2-mod-ocamlnet (>= 2.2.9-8+b2)'
# galax has the following arch:all packages: galax-doc
nmu 1 galax_1.1-7 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild with new ocamlnet, pcre-ocaml, pxp'
dw galax_1.1-7 . ALL . -m 'libapache2-mod-ocamlnet (>= 2.2.9-8+b2), libpcre-ocaml (>= 6.2.2-1), libpxp-ocaml-dev (>= 1.2.1-2+b2)'
# janest-core has the following arch:all packages: libcore-ocaml-doc
nmu 2 json-wheel_1.0.6-2 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild with new ocamlnet'
dw json-wheel_1.0.6-2 . ALL . -m 'libapache2-mod-ocamlnet (>= 2.2.9-8+b2)'
nmu 2 json-static_0.9.8-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild with new json-wheel'
dw json-static_0.9.8-1 . ALL . -m 'libjson-wheel-ocaml-dev (>= 1.0.6-2+b2)'
nmu 4 lablgtkmathview_0.7.8-5 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild with new lablgtk2'
dw lablgtkmathview_0.7.8-5 . ALL . -m 'liblablgtk2-gl-ocaml (>= 2.14.2+dfsg-1)'
# nothing to do for ledit (>= 2.02.1-1)
nmu 2 ocaml-duppy_0.3.1-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild with new pcre-ocaml'
dw ocaml-duppy_0.3.1-1 . ALL . -m 'libpcre-ocaml (>= 6.2.2-1)'
nmu 3 ocaml-lastfm_0.2.0-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild with new pcre-ocaml, ocamlnet'
dw ocaml-lastfm_0.2.0-1 . ALL . -m 'libpcre-ocaml (>= 6.2.2-1), libapache2-mod-ocamlnet (>= 2.2.9-8+b2)'
# liquidsoap has the following arch:all packages: liguidsoap
nmu 2 liquidsoap_0.9.2-3 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild with new ocaml-duppy, ocaml-lastfm, pcre-ocaml'
# liquidsoap is otherwise BD-Uninstallable
dw liquidsoap_0.9.2-3 . ALL . -m 'libduppy-ocaml-dev (>= 0.3.1-1+b2), liblastfm-ocaml-dev (>= 0.2.0-1+b3), libpcre-ocaml (>= 6.2.2-1)'
# nothing to do for ocaml-text (>= 0.4-2)
# lwt has the following arch:all packages: liblwt-ocaml-doc
nmu 1 lwt_2.1.1-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild with new lablgtk2, ocaml-text'
dw lwt_2.1.1-1 . ALL . -m 'liblablgtk2-gl-ocaml (>= 2.14.2+dfsg-1), libtext-ocaml (>= 0.4-2)'
# nothing to do for matita (>= 0.5.8-3)
nmu 2 mikmatch_1.0.2-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild with new pcre-ocaml'
dw mikmatch_1.0.2-1 . ALL . -m 'libpcre-ocaml (>= 6.2.2-1)'
# mlpost has the following arch:all packages: libmlpost-ocaml-doc
nmu 1 mlpost_0.8.1-2 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild with new cairo-ocaml'
dw mlpost_0.8.1-2 . ALL . -m 'libcairo-ocaml (>= 20090223-3+b3)'
# ocsigen has the following arch:all packages: libocsigen-ocaml-doc, ocsigen-dev
nmu 1 ocsigen_1.3.3-2 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild with new lwt, ocamlnet, pcre-ocaml'
dw ocsigen_1.3.3-2 . ALL . -m 'liblwt-glib-ocaml (>= 2.1.1-1+b1), libapache2-mod-ocamlnet (>= 2.2.9-8+b2), libpcre-ocaml (>= 6.2.2-1)'
# nothing to do for postgresql-ocaml (>= 1.14.0-1)
nmu 4 nurpawiki_1.2.3-4 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild with new ocsigen, postgresql-ocaml'
dw nurpawiki_1.2.3-4 . ALL . -m 'libocsigen-ocaml (>= 1.3.3-2+b1), libpostgresql-ocaml (>= 1.14.0-1)'
# ocaml-batteries has the following arch:all packages: libbatteries-ocaml-doc, ocaml-batteries-included
# ocaml-melt FTBFS because of some external bug
# nmu 1 ocaml-melt_1.3.0-2 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild with new mlpost'
# dw ocaml-melt_1.3.0-2 . ALL . -m 'libmlpost-ocaml-dev (>= 0.8.1-2+b1)'
nmu 3 ocamlbricks_0.50.1-4 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild with new lablgtk2'
dw ocamlbricks_0.50.1-4 . ALL . -m 'liblablgtk2-gl-ocaml (>= 2.14.2+dfsg-1)'
# ocamlviz has the following arch:all packages: libocamlviz-ocaml-doc
nmu 3 pgocaml_1.4-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild with new pcre-ocaml'
dw pgocaml_1.4-1 . ALL . -m 'libpcre-ocaml (>= 6.2.2-1)'
# nothing to do for ssreflect (>= 1.2+dfsg-7)
# why has the following arch:all packages: libwhy-coq, why-examples
nmu 3 xmlrpc-light_0.6.1-2 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild with new ocamlnet'
dw xmlrpc-light_0.6.1-2 . ALL . -m 'libapache2-mod-ocamlnet (>= 2.2.9-8+b2)'

Sorry to bug you with that... I asked to be granted the needed
privileges to wb-team [3], but got no reply from them.

[1] http://ocaml.debian.net/debian/transition-613848/
[2] http://ocaml.debian.net/debian/transition-613848/failures/ocaml-melt_1.3.0-2%2Bb9_amd64.build
[3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-wb-team/2011/02/msg00037.html


Cheers,

-- 
Stéphane

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Le 25/02/2011 16:27, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
Given your new wb-powers, I guess you'll be handling this yourself now?

Indeed, it's done.


Cheers,

--
Stéphane


--- End Message ---

Reply to: