Your message dated Tue, 25 Jan 2011 21:04:02 +0100 with message-id <20110125200402.GG30701@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr> and subject line Re: Bug#611060: unblock: popularity-contest/1.51 has caused the Debian Bug report #611060, regarding unblock: popularity-contest/1.51 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 611060: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=611060 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: unblock: popularity-contest/1.51
- From: Christian Perrier <bubulle@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 07:11:49 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20110125061149.11592.57304.reportbug@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package popularity-contest It really fixes #610840 (correct pre-dependency on debconf and cdebconf to properly handle the existence of a Serbian (Latin) translation of debconf templates...this would break lenny->squeeze upgrades to my understanding). unblock popularity-contest/1.51 -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Christian PERRIER <bubulle@debian.org>, 611060-done@bugs.debian.org
- Cc: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
- Subject: Re: Bug#611060: unblock: popularity-contest/1.51
- From: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 21:04:02 +0100
- Message-id: <20110125200402.GG30701@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20110125181007.GZ4452@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org>
- References: <[🔎] 20110125061149.11592.57304.reportbug@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org> <[🔎] 99460569791bb5093591e122cf6bc3c8.squirrel@adsl.funky-badger.org> <[🔎] 20110125181007.GZ4452@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org>
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 19:10:07 +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote: > Admitedly, the problem won't happen if 1.49 stays in lenny because it squeeze. > doesn't have that Serbian-Latin translation. However, it would mean > leaving the Serbian translation on the way too. > > I agree that you can go the ultra-safe way and leave the situation as > is: nothing will break as long as 1.49 stays in lenny. > squeeze. So squeeze will live with popcon 1.49. Cheers, JulienAttachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---