[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFC: tcptrack and #602232; any chance for squeeze?



On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 01:01:07 +0100, Leo 'costela' Antunes wrote:

> 1) remove from squeeze
> 2) upload new version to squeeze, fixing this bug and adding IPv6 support
> 3) backport just fix to main issue into squeeze version (might be hard
> finding the time for this)
> 
> I'd personally go for 2, even though we're in oh-so-deep-freeze, with
> the rationale that it can't possibly get worse than the current status
> (not working at all) and it would also help with the IPv6 goal. Plus,
> the diff between versions is pretty straightforward (though not
> particularly small; mostly refactoring to account for IPv6 support).
> 
> So, what's the verdict?
> 
I don't think 2 is an option right now.  If 3 is not possible in the
next couple of days, then 1.  And if the package is not usable at all at
the moment, please upgrade the bug to 'grave' severity so it's on the
radar.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: