[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#609372: marked as done (t-p-u: inetutils/1.6-3.1)

Your message dated Thu, 13 Jan 2011 14:23:21 +0100
with message-id <20110113132321.GT2813@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#609372: t-p-u: inetutils/1.6-3.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #609372,
regarding t-p-u: inetutils/1.6-3.1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
609372: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=609372
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception

I'd like RT permission for an NMU of inetutils to t-p-u. (Well, what I'd really
like is maintainer review of the backported patches and/or removal of the
package, but it's the only implementation of ping on kFreeBSD and I seem to
have touched it last...)

I've backed out the addition of "ping -w" support again, since the reason for
it seems to be nagios-plugins (which avoids using -w on kFreeBSD anyway) and
it's rather too late in the release process for that sort of thing.

inetutils (2:1.6-3.1) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=low

  * Non-maintainer upload.
  * Backport some of the maintainer's changes from sid, avoiding the new
    upstream version:
    - Remove obsolete and unused libopie-dev Build-Depends
    - Change inetd “tcp” and “udp” service protocol to IPv4 only
      (Closes: #404760, #519316, #594422)
    - Fix FTBFS on GNU/Hurd and GNU/kFreeBSD systems (Closes: #596638)
    - Fix IPv6 support in inetd and telnetd on GNU/kFreeBSD
    - Remove inactive co-maintainers
    - Switch Vcs fields to the new git repositories
    - Explicitly include BSD licenses into debian/copyright

 -- Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>  Sun, 09 Jan 2011 01:14:19 +0000

 debian/patches/0012-Do-not-check-for-unused-opie-library.patch                 |   26 +++
 debian/patches/0013-inetd-Change-protocol-semantics-in-inetd.conf.patch        |   77 ++++++++++
 debian/patches/0014-src-inetd.c-Use-exact-length-of-address-structure.patch    |   49 ++++++
 debian/patches/0015-telnetd-telnetd.c-Reuse-address-length.-Needed-for-O.patch |   37 ++++
 debian/patches/0016-Fix-FTBFS-on-GNU-Hurd-and-GNU-kFreeBSD-systems.patch       |   42 +++++
 inetutils-1.6/debian/changelog                                                 |   16 ++
 inetutils-1.6/debian/control                                                   |    7 
 inetutils-1.6/debian/control.in                                                |    5 
 inetutils-1.6/debian/copyright                                                 |   47 +++++-
 inetutils-1.6/debian/patches/series                                            |    5 
 10 files changed, 302 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

For the full changes, see
http://git.debian.org/?p=users/smcv/qa/inetutils.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/squeeze

Regards,
    Simon

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 12:51:02 +0000, Simon McVittie wrote:

> On Tue, 11 Jan 2011 at 20:46:08 +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Sun, 2011-01-09 at 01:29 +0000, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > > I'd like RT permission for an NMU of inetutils to t-p-u.
> > 
> > Please go ahead; thanks for working on this.
> 
> Uploaded with the diff I cited, and ACCEPTED.
> 
$ grep-excuses inetutils_tpu
inetutils_tpu (2:1.6-3 to 2:1.6-3.1)
    Maintainer: Guillem Jover 
    Ignoring block request by freeze, due to unblock request by adsb
    Not yet built on ia64 (relative to testing)
    Not yet built on mipsel (relative to testing)
    Not yet built on hppa (relative to testing) (but hppa isn't keeping up, so never mind)
    Approved by adsb
    Not considered

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: