Bug#609372: t-p-u: inetutils/1.6-3.1
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
I'd like RT permission for an NMU of inetutils to t-p-u. (Well, what I'd really
like is maintainer review of the backported patches and/or removal of the
package, but it's the only implementation of ping on kFreeBSD and I seem to
have touched it last...)
I've backed out the addition of "ping -w" support again, since the reason for
it seems to be nagios-plugins (which avoids using -w on kFreeBSD anyway) and
it's rather too late in the release process for that sort of thing.
inetutils (2:1.6-3.1) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=low
* Non-maintainer upload.
* Backport some of the maintainer's changes from sid, avoiding the new
upstream version:
- Remove obsolete and unused libopie-dev Build-Depends
- Change inetd “tcp” and “udp” service protocol to IPv4 only
(Closes: #404760, #519316, #594422)
- Fix FTBFS on GNU/Hurd and GNU/kFreeBSD systems (Closes: #596638)
- Fix IPv6 support in inetd and telnetd on GNU/kFreeBSD
- Remove inactive co-maintainers
- Switch Vcs fields to the new git repositories
- Explicitly include BSD licenses into debian/copyright
-- Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> Sun, 09 Jan 2011 01:14:19 +0000
debian/patches/0012-Do-not-check-for-unused-opie-library.patch | 26 +++
debian/patches/0013-inetd-Change-protocol-semantics-in-inetd.conf.patch | 77 ++++++++++
debian/patches/0014-src-inetd.c-Use-exact-length-of-address-structure.patch | 49 ++++++
debian/patches/0015-telnetd-telnetd.c-Reuse-address-length.-Needed-for-O.patch | 37 ++++
debian/patches/0016-Fix-FTBFS-on-GNU-Hurd-and-GNU-kFreeBSD-systems.patch | 42 +++++
inetutils-1.6/debian/changelog | 16 ++
inetutils-1.6/debian/control | 7
inetutils-1.6/debian/control.in | 5
inetutils-1.6/debian/copyright | 47 +++++-
inetutils-1.6/debian/patches/series | 5
10 files changed, 302 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
For the full changes, see
http://git.debian.org/?p=users/smcv/qa/inetutils.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/squeeze
Regards,
Simon
Reply to: