Re: [pkg-lighttpd] Bug#601177: Bug#601177: (connections.c.1228) connection closed: poll() -> ERR
- To: Olaf van der Spek <olafvdspek@gmail.com>
- Cc: Mehdi Dogguy <mehdi@dogguy.org>, 601177@bugs.debian.org, debian-release@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: [pkg-lighttpd] Bug#601177: Bug#601177: (connections.c.1228) connection closed: poll() -> ERR
- From: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
- Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 19:03:00 +0000
- Message-id: <[🔎] 1294340581.18107.54.camel@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org>
- In-reply-to: <AANLkTincH_KiVwFEmt+zjyFk4dKe=TExVttmyV4X6Bh5@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <20101024021126.GA29001@bongo.bofh.it> <AANLkTi=13Ra6WBL1kissUe5iW7yeOFXyA_PtBLnkz+E+@mail.gmail.com> <4CC58068.9040809@dogguy.org> <AANLkTink+q-fr770rwxJUGKXVZrn8F4tgxkbK=kqa3ML@mail.gmail.com> <1292178592.3595.1006.camel@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org> <AANLkTinba56S0C1DiBT923yxbAgY+AB=bMsTk1-1uD4G@mail.gmail.com> <1292184498.3595.1427.camel@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org> <AANLkTikQ-jt8CkUpuE1rTDsRgWv7Y-W0K+pMd9c1jGPd@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTincH_KiVwFEmt+zjyFk4dKe=TExVttmyV4X6Bh5@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, 2010-12-26 at 16:41 +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 9:17 PM, Olaf van der Spek <olafvdspek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 9:08 PM, Adam D. Barratt
> > <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> wrote:
> >> That's fine, but I do question why it had to been done now... the old
> >> method worked fine, and by changing it during freeze the diff has been
> >> made quite noisy for no visible benefit, making reviewing it more work.
> >>
> >> Looking more closely at the diff, not only was the above not mentioned
> >> in the changelog, but nor was the addition of conf-available files for
> >> 10-evasive, 10-flv-streaming and 10-usertrack. If these changes are
> >> important enough to be included at this stage of the freeze, why have
> >> they neither been mentioned nor documented?
> >
> > I'm not sure why Krzysztof included those in the upload. They had been
> > comitted to SVN already, but they're not required for Squeeze.
>
> Could this go into Squeeze? If not, should a new version be created
> with just the fix for this bug?
Meh; unblocked. Sorry for the delay.
Regards,
Adam
Reply to: