Re: advice for syncevolution in squeeze

["Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>]

On Sun, 2010-11-14 at 12:06 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Oct 2010 17:08:22 +0100, "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> wrote:
> > On Sun, 2010-10-10 at 14:33 -0300, David Bremner wrote:
> > 
> > My preference would be to see if the fixes for data loss, crashes, etc.
> > are backportable to the current version in the archive.  A quick look
> > through the git log shows many more commits than I'd imagine correspond
> > to the fixes mentioned but I obviously don't know the codebase well
> > enough to tell if a sequence of commits might correspond to a single
> > fix.
> 
> I have prepared a potential upload for testing-proposed-updates
> cherry-picking most but not all of the fixes mentioned in Patrick's
> previous messages. 

Thanks for that.

>      - Nokia E55: needs absolute alarm times (MBC #1657)
>      - Nokia phones: alarm times in UTC, sending PHOTO (BMC #1657, #5860)

Does the latter of these not render the former redundant?  The comment
in the generic Nokia fix mentions that the alarm time issue was first
seen on the E55 and the fix appears to be the same in both.

Regards,

Adam