Hi Adam, Le samedi 23 octobre 2010 15:06:13, Adam D. Barratt a écrit : > I've now had chance to review the diff; apologies for the delay. It > turns out that a lot of the changes are JavaDoc or the reformatting of > method headers or calls, although the latter particularly didn't help > make the diff more readable. :-/ > > Having looked through the list of upstream bugfixes, I'd be happy to > unblock those, but: Thanks for you review and thank for your unbock "ACK". > > >> * Enable rxtx support: > > >> - d/control: Add Build-Depends on librxtx-java. > > [...] > > > > Why was this support not enabled earlier? New dependencies and > > > features aren't really appropriate at this stage. > > > > rxtx feature was not really stable in mina RC1 release, so it was > > disabled. > > I've re-enabled it for 2.0 as I've successfully tested it locally. > > > > If this is too much for squeeze, I can disable this rxtx support again as > > reverse-depends of mina2 doesn't use this feature. > > Sorry, but yes, if the feature hasn't been enabled previously and isn't > used by any of the r-deps, I'd prefer that it stay disabled for Squeeze. I plan to upload a mina2 2.0.0+dfsg-1.1 to t-p-u with this change dropped. Is this okay for you ? Cheers, -- Damien - Debian Developper http://wiki.debian.org/DamienRaudeMorvan
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.