Your message dated Sun, 3 Oct 2010 21:32:45 +0200 with message-id <20101003193245.GV10564@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr> and subject line Re: Bug#598855: unblock: gconf/2.28.1-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #598855, regarding unblock: gconf/2.28.1-4 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 598855: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=598855 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: unblock: gconf/2.28.1-4
- From: Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 18:35:43 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 1286037343.6455.69.camel@tomoyo>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception Hi, please unblock gconf for squeeze. gconf (2.28.1-4) unstable; urgency=low . * 03_error_message.patch: new patch. Replace the error message by something more accurate nowadays. Closes: #582839. Patch attached. Cheers, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' “If you behave this way because you are blackmailed by someone, `- […] I will see what I can do for you.” -- Jörg SchillingIndex: GConf-2.28.1/gconf/gconf-internals.c =================================================================== --- GConf-2.28.1.orig/gconf/gconf-internals.c 2010-05-29 10:45:17.894434221 +0200 +++ GConf-2.28.1/gconf/gconf-internals.c 2010-05-29 10:47:17.758430078 +0200 @@ -2882,7 +2882,7 @@ gconf_activate_server (gboolean start_i g_set_error (error, GCONF_ERROR, GCONF_ERROR_NO_SERVER, - _("Failed to contact configuration server; some possible causes are that you need to enable TCP/IP networking for ORBit, or you have stale NFS locks due to a system crash. See http://projects.gnome.org/gconf/ for information. (Details - %s)"), + _("Failed to contact configuration server; the most common cause is a missing or misconfigured D-Bus session bus daemon. See http://projects.gnome.org/gconf/ for information. (Details - %s)"), failure_log->len > 0 ? failure_log->str : _("none")); g_string_free (failure_log, TRUE);Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org>, 598855-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#598855: unblock: gconf/2.28.1-4
- From: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>
- Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2010 21:32:45 +0200
- Message-id: <20101003193245.GV10564@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1286133599.25857.4.camel@tomoyo>
- References: <[🔎] 1286037343.6455.69.camel@tomoyo> <[🔎] 20101003144600.GN10564@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr> <[🔎] 1286133599.25857.4.camel@tomoyo>
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 21:19:59 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le dimanche 03 octobre 2010 à 16:46 +0200, Julien Cristau a écrit : > > That changes a translated (or, well, translatable) string though :/ > > Indeed, but it’s a choice between an inaccurate but translated message, > and a correct one in English. Since in both cases a user encountering > such an error would have to ask a technical person (likely the one who > broke the system so that the error appears), I think the latter is > preferable. > OK, unblocked. > Alternatively we can ask for translations on debian-i18n for that > string, it would be easy to integrate them. > That would be nice, thanks. Cheers, JulienAttachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---