Re: Migrating netcdf3 -> netcdf4
On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 04:17:21PM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 03:09:18PM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> > Dear RMs and interested maintainers (in Bcc)
> >
> > What follows is the list of netcdf build-depending packages currently in the
> > archive. The netcdf4 package is available in experimental since a while
> > and currently at RC3 stage. It will be released quite soon and appears in
> > good shape for Debian, after some fixes already merged upstream. It builds
> > everywhere and pass unit tests as expected.
> >
>
> [...]
>
> > v-sim (Debian Science Team <debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>)
> > vtk (A. Maitland Bottoms <bottoms@debian.org>)
> > libmesh (Debian Scientific Computing Team <pkg-scicomp-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>)
> > deal.ii (Adam C. Powell, IV <hazelsct@debian.org>)
> > octave-octcdf (Debian Octave Group <pkg-octave-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>)
> > dx (Daniel Kobras <kobras@debian.org>)
> > libpdl-netcdf-perl (Henning Glawe <glaweh@debian.org>)
> > nco (Charlie Zender <zender@uci.edu>)
> > gri (Peter S Galbraith <psg@debian.org>)
> > gerris (Debian Science Maintainers <debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>)
> > magics++ (Alastair McKinstry <mckinstry@debian.org>)
> > gnudatalanguage (Gürkan Sengün <gurkan@phys.ethz.ch>)
> > kst (Mark Hymers <mhy@debian.org>)
> > gmt (Debian GIS Project <pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>)
> > python-scientific (Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>)
> > grads (Alastair McKinstry <mckinstry@debian.org>)
> > labplot (Helen Faulkner <helen@debian.org>)
> > gdal (Debian GIS Project <pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>)
> > grace (Nicholas Breen <nbreen@ofb.net>)
> > ncview (Debian GIS Project <pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>)
> > minc (Debian-Med Packaging Team <debian-med-packaging@lists.alioth.debian.org>)
> > cdo (Alastair McKinstry <mckinstry@debian.org>)
> >
>
> I just rebuilt all interested packages on my development box, without
> problems, but for a few packages that FTBSes for other reasons. I think
> it is a good idea to upload all resulting packages onto experimental in
> order to check if all archs are ok. In the meantime 4.1.1 has been
> released with final merge of all my changes. Kudos to netcdf
> folks. I'll wait a go by RMs as asked by aba. The second step will
> be final uploading in sid and a round of binNMUs.
>
If none has something against, it I'm going to upload 4.1.1 into unstable
and asking for a bounce of binNMUs for starting migration.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
Reply to: