[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Ongoing Python Transition: related FTBFSes



On 28.01.2010 12:50, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Scott Kitterman<debian@kitterman.com>  (17/12/2009):
I believe that we are getting close to uploading Python 2.6 to
Unstable and dropping Python 2.4 as a supported Python version.  If
we finish preparations in the next week, are there any ongoing
transitions a python2.6/python- defaults upload would entangle that
would cause the release team to want the uploads to be delayed?

Hi,

I'm not sure it's the proper thread to mention this, but from a quick
look, it sounds like related.

FWIW, here are some FTBFSes I've reported lately, which look due to
this transition:
   #567226: pysvn

that's a wrong report, pycxx needs binNMUed, then the package does build.


Reply to: