On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 23:29, Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> wrote: > > Most of his answer seemed to be about why we should accept the newer > version of cl-asdf rather than the source format change; "lintian didn't > like the empty diff.gz" and "people on IRC told me to do it" aren't the > greatest of reasonings either. What's wrong with the 3.0? Why is it so hard to change?