[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#605350: marked as done (unblock: centerim/4.22.10-1)

Your message dated Thu, 16 Dec 2010 20:43:43 +0100
with message-id <20101216194343.GF5063@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#605350: unblock: centerim/4.22.10-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #605350,
regarding unblock: centerim/4.22.10-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
605350: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=605350
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org

Please unblock centerim/4.22.10-1.

Centerim is an upstream frozen project, their releases usually
include only security fixes. Last release (4.22.10) fixes
CVE-2009-3720.
-- 
... mpd is off

. ''`.                               Dmitry E. Oboukhov
: :’  :   email: unera@debian.org jabber://UNera@uvw.ru
`. `~’              GPGKey: 1024D / F8E26537 2006-11-21
  `- 1B23 D4F8 8EC0 D902 0555  E438 AB8C 00CF F8E2 6537

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 09:55:56 +0300, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:

> Package: release.debian.org
> 
> Please unblock centerim/4.22.10-1.
> 
> Centerim is an upstream frozen project, their releases usually
> include only security fixes. Last release (4.22.10) fixes
> CVE-2009-3720.

Most of the changes don't look like security fixes, but noise.  Oh well,
unblocked.  Worst case yahoo got b0rked, and I'm not going to care.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: