On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 04:14:50PM -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 04:11:07PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > > > > I'd be interested to know if anyone has a recommendation on how to > > handle this. The two packages in question are -dbg packages that are > > created by dh_strip, excerpted from debian/rules below: > > > > dh_strip -s -psasl2-bin -plibsasl2-2 -plibsasl2-modules -plibsasl2-modules-ldap -plibsasl2-modules-otp -plibsasl2-modules-sql -plibsasl2-modules-gssapi-mit -plibsasl2-dev -Nlibsasl2-modules-gssapi-heimdal --dbg-package=cyrus-sasl2-dbg > > dh_strip -s -plibsasl2-modules-gssapi-heimdal -Nsasl2-bin -Nlibsasl2-2 -Nlibsasl2-modules -Nlibsasl2-modules-ldap -Nlibsasl2-modules-otp -Nlibsasl2-modules-sql -Nlibsasl2-modules-gssapi-mit -Nlibsasl2-dev --dbg-package=cyrus-sasl2-heimdal-dbg > > > > Both packages need to be able to be installed together, so my question > > centers around whehter it is OK to put a diversion in place so that > > cyrus-sasl2-heimdal-dbg diverts the file. What does everyone think? > > > So, it appears that there are some other possibilities, thanks to a > posting by Luca Capello [0]. The first possibility is trivial, but is > not as "correct." The second is more "correct" but a larger diff. > Given that this must go into Lenny, what opinion or preference does the > release team have on the matter? > > Regards, > > -Roberto > > [0] http://bugs.debian.org/610977 > Given the just announced deep freeze, I'd like some guidance from the release team on this, so that I can prepare an update with an acceptable fix to go into Squeeze. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sánchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature