Re: xmltv: what's the best way to keep it up-to-date?
On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 19:54 +0000, Chris Butler wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 08:47:01PM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Sun, 2010-11-14 at 14:59 +0000, Chris Butler wrote:
> > > Upstream for xmltv are currently working towards another release to fix
> > > another couple of issues that have cropped up since my last message on this…
> > >
> > > Any thoughts on what I should do about the package for squeeze?
> > Apologies for the delay (again). Please feel free to upload the version
> > from experimental to unstable, so we can look at getting it in to
> > Squeeze.
> > Is there an ETA for the new upstream release you mentioned?
> The new upstream version is now out, and I've prepared packages in my local
> git repo. Should I upload that version to unstable instead of the one
> currently in experimental?
Yes, that sounds like the best plan.