Re: xmltv: what's the best way to keep it up-to-date?
On Sun, 2010-11-14 at 14:59 +0000, Chris Butler wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 03:23:53PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > The agenda for the release team meeting next weekend includes a
> > discussion on the future scope and operation of volatile, so we're
> > deferring a decision on this case until after that.
> Upstream for xmltv are currently working towards another release to fix
> another couple of issues that have cropped up since my last message on this…
> Any thoughts on what I should do about the package for squeeze?
Apologies for the delay (again). Please feel free to upload the version
from experimental to unstable, so we can look at getting it in to
Is there an ETA for the new upstream release you mentioned?