On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:48:18AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > I fear things will start getting -EPIPE instead of being killed by > SIGPIPE, which they won't expect. It'll probably be fine in most(all?) > cases, but I don't know what kind of scripts people are running from > dhclient, and I'd rather not find out now. > > So it's probably preferrable to get just minimal fixes in squeeze, and > we can move to a new upstream post release. Okay, I'll see what I can do about coming up with a patch to just address CVE-2010-3611 then.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature