[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#603274: marked as done (unblock: cups/1.4.4-7)

Your message dated Fri, 12 Nov 2010 15:38:14 +0100
with message-id <20101112143814.GA21708@patate.is-a-geek.org>
and subject line Re: [Pkg-cups-devel] Bug#603274: unblock: cups/1.4.4-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #603274,
regarding unblock: cups/1.4.4-7
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org

603274: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=603274
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package cups. It fixes CVE-2010-2941.

unblock cups/1.4.4-7

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.ISO-8859-15@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 15:33:34 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:

> Anyway, on Debian it doesn't matter if it succeeds or fails; I don't
> consider it very urgent to change it, do you?
As long as it doesn't abort the install when it fails I suppose it's


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

--- End Message ---

Reply to: