On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 19:10:04 +0100 "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> wrote: > tags 540341 + moreinfo > thanks > > On Sat, 2010-10-30 at 14:36 +0100, Neil Williams wrote: > > I'd like to ask for apt-cross to be removed from Squeeze to fix the > > RC bug #591457 and a long standing bug, #502433 which, together with > > other internal issues, make apt-cross unsuitable for release > > alongside the version of apt already in Squeeze. > > Checking reverse dependencies... > # Broken Depends: > emdebian-crush: emdebian-crush > > We can remove apt-cross if that's what you want, but either > emdebian-crush will need to be removed as well, or it'll need to stop > depending on apt-cross (I'm not sure how practical that is). Bah. My bad. A new version of emdebian-crush which does not depend on apt-cross is in NEW awaiting experimental because that depends on the new xapt package. As outlined on IRC, I'll upload a version of the emdebian-crush source package which drops the relevant scripts from the emdebian-crush binary package so that apt-cross dependency can be dropped. That version can then go into unstable, I'll ask for a freeze exception and it can migrate, allowing apt-cross to be removed. -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.data-freedom.org/ http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/ http://e-mail.is-not-s.ms/
Attachment:
pgpUj1BF1suU_.pgp
Description: PGP signature