Your message dated Sat, 23 Oct 2010 00:43:33 +0200 with message-id <4CC21395.606@dogguy.org> and subject line Re: Bug#599510: future unblock: alsa-lib/1.0.23-2.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #599510, regarding future unblock: alsa-lib/1.0.23-2.1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 599510: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=599510 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: future unblock: alsa-lib/1.0.23-2.1
- From: Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>
- Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 10:01:07 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20101008090107.GA7665@reptile.pseudorandom.co.uk>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception I've uploaded a delayed/14 NMU for alsa-lib, for http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=589896 (crashes due to unloading plugins that are still in use), by backporting a patch from upstream. Its diffstat looks like this: include/local.h | 12 ++-- src/control/control.c | 40 +++---------- src/control/control_local.h | 2 src/dlmisc.c | 132 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- src/pcm/pcm.c | 38 ++---------- src/pcm/pcm_local.h | 2 src/pcm/pcm_rate.c | 46 +++++++-------- 7 files changed, 151 insertions(+), 121 deletions(-) The full patch and the nmudiff are on #589896: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=66;filename=refcount-dlobjs.patch;att=1;bug=589896 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=73;filename=alsa-lib-1.0.23-2.1-nmu.diff;att=1;bug=589896 While preparing the NMU I also noticed that configure was failing to detect support for versioned symbols, because it was grepping ./libtool, which doesn't necessarily exist. I corrected this with a one-line patch to configure (grep ${srcdir}/ltmain.sh instead), which I now realise probably also fixes important bug http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=573881, related to the double-build release goal. I can drop that change if necessary. If this is too intrusive for squeeze, there are potential workarounds for #589896 in either alsa-lib (don't unload plugins whether they're in use or not), PortAudio (don't tell ALSA to unload plugins), or OpenAL (forcibly disable PortAudio support, since PortAudio is the only backend that actually tells ALSA to unload plugins, and isn't incredibly useful on Linux). There are more details on the bug. Regards, SimonAttachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>, 599510-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#599510: future unblock: alsa-lib/1.0.23-2.1
- From: Mehdi Dogguy <mehdi@dogguy.org>
- Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 00:43:33 +0200
- Message-id: <4CC21395.606@dogguy.org>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20101022112829.GA27686@reptile.pseudorandom.co.uk>
- References: <handler.599510.B.128652847320479.ack@bugs.debian.org> <[🔎] 20101008090107.GA7665@reptile.pseudorandom.co.uk> <[🔎] 20101020135405.GA16536@reptile.pseudorandom.co.uk> <[🔎] 20101020182454.GX21708@patate.is-a-geek.org> <[🔎] 20101022112829.GA27686@reptile.pseudorandom.co.uk>
On 10/22/2010 01:28 PM, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 at 20:24:54 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: >> Sorry for the delay. The NMU diff looks reasonable to me, thanks. Let >> me know when it lands and I'll unblock the package. > > ACCEPTED. Please do: > > unblock alsa-lib/1.0.23-2.1 > Done. > Thanks for herding the release process forward, > S > > > -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/
--- End Message ---