[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#597881: marked as done (unblock: twisted-runner/10.1.0-2)

Your message dated Fri, 8 Oct 2010 10:30:53 +0100
with message-id <0384b35251a2c08e26917e8e79f03f99.squirrel@adsl.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#597881: unblock: twisted-runner/10.1.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #597881,
regarding unblock: twisted-runner/10.1.0-2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org

597881: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=597881
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

 twisted-runner  (10.1.0-2) unstable; urgency=low

   * Activate the `twisted-plugins-cache' trigger instead of explicitely
     rebuilding the plugin cache.

 -- Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>  Wed, 18 Aug 2010 11:53:47 +0200

as in all other twisted-* packages.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Fri, October 8, 2010 09:36, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 07.10.2010 21:20, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> On Sun, 2010-09-26 at 11:55 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>>> The source package also includes twisted/plugins/dropin.cache, which
>>> doesn't appear to be in the other packages; should that not be
>>> generated
>>> by the trigger?
>> Ping?
> how is this question relevant for the migration? is it in the binary
> package too?

No, it's not in the binary package.  But then, "yes, it's cruft in the
source package but not in the binary so I don't believe it should be an
issue in this case" wouldn't have been that hard.




--- End Message ---

Reply to: