Re: Please consider unblocking boxbackup_0.11~rc3~r2502-4
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 18:02:03 (CEST), Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> On 16/10/2010 11:18, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> While boxbackup was ready at freeze time, unfortuntately, I didn't
>> notice that it didn't migrate at that time because of a missing build
>> on armel. The FTBFS is caused by a wrong install pattern in
>> debian/boxbackup-{client,server}.install files, which is rectified in
>> the new upload, even for kFreeBSD architectures. The package
>> boxbackup_0.11~rc3~r2502-2 was tested in unstable since end of june.
>> For this reason I'm presenting a reviewable, minimal diff from that
>> version to what I'm requesting an unblock.
>>
>
> It wn't be possible to include this in Squeeze I'm afraid. Are there any
> important/critical fixes you want to include in Squeeze?
I have to admit that I noticed too late that the rc3 version didn't make
it to testing because of the missing build; I just assumed rc3 was
already in and don't really remember what exactly changed. However, I do
remember (several) FTBFS fixes and rather conservative upstream
changes. I do know that the current binary works, but in case we need to
include some security update after release, I fear we won't be able to
offer updated packages.
--
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4
Reply to: