On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 19:01 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > On 19/10/2010 16:16, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote: > > On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 08:36 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 22:39:29 +0200, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote: > >> > >>> I finally got an answer and small patch (attached) from upstream > >>> Re this issue. Shall I prepare jblas 1.1.1-2 that includes this > >>> patch? > >>> > >> Yes. > > > > OK done. I am attaching the diff.gz, the remaining packaging files are > > here. > > > > svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-java/trunk/jblas > > > > Shall I upload 1.1.1-2 to unstable? > > > > I'm not sure I understand the logic behind: do you want to leave a broken > version in sid? Even if Julien nacks it later, there is already a broken > version in sid that should be fixed. Am I wrong? True. Uploaded. Buildd's are building now https://buildd.debian.org/~luk/status/package.php?suite=unstable&p=jblas Thanks, Soeren -- For the one fact about the future of which we can be certain is that it will be utterly fantastic. -- Arthur C. Clarke, 1962
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part