Bug#597880: unblock: python-stdlib-extensions/2.6.6-1

[Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>]

On 08.10.2010 10:59, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Fri, October 8, 2010 09:38, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > On 07.10.2010 21:20, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 20:14 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 21:42 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > > > python-stdlib-extensions (2.6.6-1) unstable; urgency=low
> > > > >
> > > > >      * Bump the package version to 2.6.6.
> > > >
> > > > Possibly a silly question, but... why?
> > >
> > > Ping?
> >
> > same for python-profiler.
>
> That has other changes (and no unblock request, afaics).

then please consider this request for python-profiler too.

> > Python 2.6 is split in more than one source package
> > for packaging and license reasons.
>
> Indeed.
>
> The only change in python-stdlib-extensions appears to be the version
> number, so I was simply querying whether there was some reason I'd missed
> that it was technically necessary for all of the involved packages to have
> exactly the same version number if there was no functional change between
> 2.6.5-1 and 2.6.6-1.

No, I don't know of any functional change.  I'm just waiting for the first bug 
report that the version numbers don't match.

The only package I know that depends on the subminor version number is the 
apache plugin.  But I assume that somebody did take care of this when approving 
the migration of 2.6.6 to testing.

  Matthias