[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#599378: marked as done (unblock: debootstrap)

Your message dated Thu, 7 Oct 2010 13:38:45 +0200
with message-id <20101007113845.GX2854@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#599378: unblock: debootstrap
has caused the Debian Bug report #599378,
regarding unblock: debootstrap
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org

599378: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=599378
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org

debootstrap in squeeze is currently 1.0.23, there have been two versions in 
unstable since then. Here are the changelog entries

debootstrap (1.0.25) unstable; urgency=low

  * Remove debug statement that slipped in.
  * Add test to guard against devices.tar.gz being empty.
  * /dev/MAKEDEV cannot be relied on (udev likes to make it a symlink to
    true). Always use /sbin/MAKEDEV. Closes: #598080

 -- Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>  Sun, 26 Sep 2010 13:18:31 -0400

debootstrap (1.0.24) unstable; urgency=low

  [ Miguel Figueiredo ]
  * Apply patches from by Jonathan Klee and Guillaume Chauvel
    to add support to https (closes: #521196).

  [ Colin Watson ]
  * Add (Ubuntu) natty as a symlink to gutsy.

  [ Joey Hess ]
  * Add support for wheezy. Closes: #597461

 -- Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>  Sun, 19 Sep 2010 21:40:00 -0400

I asked joeyh if these were important for squeeze,

<taggart> debootstrap is currently 1.0.23 in squeeze, do you think .24 or 
.25 should go in?
<taggart> I am going to update the lenny backport, so I thought I'd check 
<joeyh> yes, we need support for stable+1 in stable
<taggart> ok, should we file a bug on release.debian.org (or maybe just ask 
in #debian-release or something)?
<joeyh> yeah - can you?
<taggart> ok
<joeyh> wouldn't hurt to age it an extra 10 days imho
<taggart> it's 10 days now, do you mean 10 more?
<joeyh> yes.. the bug in .24 would not be noticed by patch review..

Please consider unblocking debootstrap once it's had sufficient aging.


Matt Taggart

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Wed, Oct  6, 2010 at 20:32:24 -0700, Matt Taggart wrote:

> Please consider unblocking debootstrap once it's had sufficient aging.
+      --private-key=file     read the private key from file
+      --certificate=file     use the client certificate stored in file (PEM)
+      --no-check-certificate do not check certificate against certificate authorities

It might be nice to explicitly mention https and/or ssl here (and in the manpage).

Set aging to 20 days and unblocked, thanks.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

--- End Message ---

Reply to: