Re: Freeze exception request for xfsprogs-3.1.3

[Nathan Scott <nathans@aconex.com>]

Hey all,

----- "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> wrote:
> On Thu, September 30, 2010 08:10, Nathan Scott wrote:
> >
> > The changes that were correct and agreed to *have been merged*,
> > as I said - one or two were incorrect, not reviewed and (Anibal
> > will agree I'm sure) shouldn't have been patched in.
> 
> You said there were no changes, not that there were no changes other
> than
> those which had previously been agreed to somewhere we weren't privy
> to;
> it wasn't at all obvious from your original mail or reviewing the
> diff
> that the reversion was intentional.

Apologies there, I should have been more clear & in truth,
it was many weeks back that 3.1.3 was uploaded and some of
these changes I'd forgotten about (but all remain valid &
were made with the best of intentions).

I like to think we're all on the same side here ... as the
guy who's being maintaining this package for 7/8 years now,
I still would like to push, on behalf of the users who've
contacted me requesting it, for xfsprogs-3.1.3 to be let
through into this release.

> In any case, I do have a query on one of the source changes:

That'd be part of a bug fix - xfs@oss.sgi.com is the right
place to discuss that if you have concerns there, thanks!

Thanks for the input, all round.  I appreciate that some of
us have different opinions on some things discussed here, &
I think we'll have to continue to be in disagreement on a
few of these things.

cheers.

-- 
Nathan