Re: stable proposed update: ser2net, fixing #535159
On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 22:01 +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 05:07:18PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Looking at the code, only the changes in the third hunk (around line
> > 583) actually appear to make any practical difference; the others
> > shouldn't hurt though, for a "belt and braces" approach.
> It is the patch published by upstream to patch the issue; I'd like to
> take that one in full and verbatim to stay synchronized with upstream.
> > In terms of a stable update, we prefer not to change or introduce patch
> > systems so the changes should be applied directly via the .diff.gz.
> > One also assumes that the copy of config.log from an aborted run was
> > not intended to be included. :-)
> Strike. New debdiff attached.
Thanks. Please go ahead with the upload.