On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 19:10:50 +0200, Christian Kastner wrote: > On 09/19/2010 06:21 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 17:21:38 +0200, Christian Kastner wrote: > > > >> Assuming that #596283 will be fixed by a -2 release of shadow, I was > >> wondering whether the Release Team would like a cron -115 as well, with > >> this feature removed from /etc/cron.daily/standard. > >> > > Sounds reasonable. I'm not sure introducing yet more 'Breaks' is > > necessary though. The worst case if you're using new cron and old > > shadow is your stuff isn't backed up, right? > > That is correct. However, that worst case -- however unlikely -- might > be severe enough to warrant the Breaks:. I'm therefore tending towards > the latter, but will leave the final call up to you. > I guess the other option is to leave both backups in place for squeeze, and remove the one from cron later. A bit confusing to have those files backed up from 2 places, but no harm other than that. I think I'd like that more than Breaks... Cheers, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature