Re: live-* packages
On 09/07/2010 11:05 PM, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> On 09/07/2010 10:22 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
>> I'm noticed several unblock requests for some live-* tools even
>> soem of them have been already unblocked lately
>
> i haven't seen any unblocks granted yet for any one of
> live-{boot,build,config,manual}, which is why the bugs are still
> open, no?
>
I have this in my hint file:
# 2010-08-22; done 2010-09-01
unblock live-config/2.0.2-1
unblock live-boot/2.0.0-1
That leaves live-manual and live-build. The former could be unblocked
(but I'll let adsb decide on this) and the latter still needs more work.
> as said earlier, due to it's nature, the development cycle for
> debian-live stuff ends quite late before the release. for lenny,
> packages have been unblocked continuesly from time to time. let me
> know if you intend to change this for squeeze.
>
Well, it was the case during lenny's freeze because (if I'm not
mistaken) the packages were still brand new at that time, which doesn't
apply anymore. Besides, I don't see changes having something related to
the archive's state. If there are any, please comment on them.
>> [1] live-boot
>
> at least one more upload to fix #591330.
>
which is of severity "normal" but well, I can see arguments for having
it in…
>> live-build
>
> some more uploads, to fix remaining bugs in the bts, plus changes to
> use syslinux-themes-debian, and more if more bugs get discovered
> (which is quite likely, given that squeeze still changes and l-b
> needs adjustments for that).
>
Why asking for an unblock if there are still changes to be
uploaded/worked on? and can you explain what external changes influence
on l-b?
>> live-config
>
> no upload planned, however, possibly some if more bugs get
> discovered.
>
Good.
>> live-magic
>
> needs only one more upload to fix #595985, otherwise no upload
> planned.
>
Ok.
>> live-manual
>
> on top of 2.0~a5-1, one or two uploads to update the content from
> etch/lenny to squeeze. possibly more if people contribute more
> documentation.
>
Ok. I hope that no packaging changes will be involved.
> syslinux-themes-debian
>
> needs one more upload for new squeeze entries.
>
and by entries, you mean?
> syslinux
>
> needs one more upload for os-proper and extlinux.d support.
>
That's a new feature, right? How is it critical for Squeeze?
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
Reply to: