On Sat, Sep 04, 2010 at 01:10:28PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > clone 595473 -1 > Actually it's libunique that wants dbus unconditionally if compiled with > dbus support. It does have other backends, too, but no way to catch > this error or to set another backend at runtime. It thus breaks related > applications when invoking libunique. > > libunique must thus depend on both dbus and dbus-x11. This is also > somewhat a clone of #497401. Turning off DBUS would break the ABI, AFAICS. So I guess depending on dbus it is. (As bacon's already turned on according to the build log, I still wonder why there's no sane fallback in this case...) Kind regards, Philipp Kern
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature